whitespace_analyze

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It states what is analyzed but does not describe the output format, whether it returns counts, positions, or a summary. The behavioral traits beyond 'analyze whitespace' are opaque.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is exceptionally concise, using two short sentences. Every word serves a purpose. It is front-loaded with the core action and lists parameter descriptions effectively.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple analysis tool, the description covers the input and purpose. However, it lacks any mention of the output, which is relevant since an output schema exists. An agent would benefit from knowing what kind of analysis result to expect (e.g., counts, statistics). The description is minimally complete but leaves a gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds a brief explanation for the single 'text' parameter ('Text to analyze whitespace in'), which provides minimal context beyond the schema's name and type. With 0% schema description coverage, the description partially compensates but is not rich. For a single string parameter, this is adequate but not exemplary.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool analyzes whitespace usage, listing specific categories (spaces, tabs, newlines, trailing spaces). It is a specific verb+resource combination. However, it does not explicitly distinguish from the sibling tool 'clean_whitespace', which likely modifies whitespace instead of just analyzing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or when not to use it. The description is purely functional without any usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.