Generate insightful questions from any content, including factual, analytical, and hypothetical types. Useful for study, research, or content analysis.
{d}
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | Yes | ||
| to | No | ||
| tool | No | questions | |
| desc | No | Generate insightful questions from content (factual, analytical, hypothetical). | |
| params_desc | No | text — Content to generate questions from. |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided and description is empty, so no behavioral information is disclosed. The description carries full burden and fails entirely.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short but is a placeholder, not concise. It fails to earn its place by providing any useful content.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given 5 parameters, no schema descriptions, no annotations, and an output schema, the description is entirely inadequate for an agent to use the tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0% and description '{d}' adds no meaning to the five parameters. The description does not compensate for missing param info.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description is '{d}', a placeholder with no verb or resource, providing no purpose information. It fails to state what the tool does.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No description content, so no guidance on when to use this tool versus sibling tools like 'quiz' or others.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/scotia1973-bot/api-hub'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server