Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to API Hub MCP — 337+ Tools

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Multi-tool MCP server for AI agents with 29 tools across web scraping, SEO analysis, screenshot and PDF generation, domain intelligence, content extraction, multi-chain EVM blockchain queries, and security toolkit. Free tier available with no auth required.
      12 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A unified MCP server providing AI agents with 40+ developer APIs including geolocation, crypto prices, DNS lookup, and web scraping. Enables natural language access to various tools through a single gateway.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes all 77 ScrapingDog API endpoints as AI-ready tools, enabling web scraping, Google search, Amazon product data, LinkedIn profiles, YouTube transcripts, and more through a single API key.
      77
      28 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      55+ pay-per-call tools for AI agents over MCP: live telemetry, blockchain/on-chain checks, environmental, transit, finance, and network utilities. No API key or signup — agents pay per request with x402 USDC micropayments (Base and Solana).
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server providing over 390 tools across 66 providers, including major SaaS platforms like GitHub, Slack, and Stripe. It enables AI assistants to interact directly with a wide array of public APIs and utility services through a single interface.
      -

    TDQS

    C2.2/5.0

    Scored across 338 tools

    Disambiguation1/5

    With 338 tools, massive overlap is pervasive: there are a dozen readability metric tools (gunning_fog_score, smog_index, ari_score, etc.), multiple unique-ID generators (generate_uuid, generate_nanoid, generate_ulids), and duplicate text transformers (invert_case vs swap_case, summarize vs tldr). Agents would constantly struggle to pick between near-identical tools.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming is highly inconsistent: some tools use verb_noun (generate_qr_code, convert_currency), others use *_calc or calculate_* (mortgage_calculator, calculate_date), and a large block uses single vague words (summarize, translate, grammar, faq, quiz). The mixed convert_* and *_convert patterns (convert_units vs speed_convert) further break predictability.

    Tool Count1/5

    338 tools is an extreme count, far beyond the 50+ threshold for a score of 1. Most are trivial one-function utilities like flip_coin, roll_dice, reverse_text, and pad_text, which bloat the tool surface and make selection dramatically harder without adding meaningful capability.

    Completeness2/5

    The server has no coherent domain—it is a grab-bag of physics, finance, text, color, code, and web utilities—so completeness is ill-defined and impossible to satisfy. Despite enormous breadth, coverage is fragmented (many near-duplicate readability/color/loan tools) while whole categories like image processing or PDF handling are absent.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing