grammar

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, and the description is a placeholder. There is no disclosure of behavioral traits such as mutation, permissions, or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is under-specified, consisting only of '{d}'. It is not concise in a helpful sense; it fails to convey any useful information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the large set of sibling tools and the absence of a meaningful description, the tool definition is completely inadequate for an agent to understand when to use it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool description adds no parameter meaning. While the schema's default for 'desc' and 'params_desc' provide some clues, these are not part of the description. Schema coverage is 0% from the description's perspective.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is a placeholder '{d}', which does not state the tool's purpose. The default value for the 'desc' parameter hints at grammar fixing, but the official description is missing, making it misleading.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines are provided. The description is absent, offering no context on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'proofread' or 'paraphrase'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.