Webhooks_Deleteawebhook
Delete a webhook to stop receiving event notifications from the Meta API Gateway.
Instructions
Delete a webhook
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Delete a webhook to stop receiving event notifications from the Meta API Gateway.
Delete a webhook
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description explicitly states 'Delete', indicating a destructive mutation. However, no annotations are provided, and the description does not elaborate on side effects, reversibility, or permissions required. The basic behavioral trait is clear but lacks depth.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is only three words, perfectly concise for a simple delete operation with no parameters. Every word is essential.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description is adequate for a trivial delete operation, but it omits mention of how the webhook is identified (likely via URL path). No output schema exists, but a delete tool typically returns nothing. It could benefit from a note about scope or prerequisites.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0 parameters, the baseline is 4. The schema coverage is 100%, and the description adds nothing about parameters, which is acceptable given the minimal input schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a webhook' clearly states the verb (delete) and resource (webhook). It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'Webhooks_Createawebhook' and 'Webhooks_Listallwebhooks'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No context about prerequisites or conditions is given, leaving the agent to infer usage solely from the name.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/savhascelik/meta-api-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server