Checkouts_Listallcheckouts
List all checkouts to view current borrowed items and manage returns.
Instructions
List all checkouts
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all checkouts to view current borrowed items and manage returns.
List all checkouts
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, and the description offers no behavioral details such as pagination, ordering, result size limits, or side effects. The agent cannot gauge the tool's behavior beyond a generic list operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
While the description is short (one sentence), it is overly minimal and omits essential context, making it under-specified rather than efficiently concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, the description is insufficient. It fails to explain the return format, behavior, or how it differs from similar sibling tools, leaving the agent with inadequate information.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so the schema already fully defines the input. The description does not need to add parameter details, and it is acceptable as is.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'List all checkouts' states the verb and resource clearly, but it is nearly identical to the sibling tool 'listCheckouts', and it is largely a tautology with the tool name.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'listCheckouts' or other list tools. The agent must infer usage independently.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/savhascelik/meta-api-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server