SubscripitonItems_Listallsubscr
List all subscription items from the Meta API to view current subscriptions.
Instructions
List all subscription items
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all subscription items from the Meta API to view current subscriptions.
List all subscription items
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No behavioral details beyond 'list all'. No information on pagination, rate limits, or potential side effects. With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of disclosure and fails to provide adequate transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence with no wasted words. However, it is extremely minimal and could benefit from slight expansion for clarity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given zero parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is the sole source of information. It conveys the essential action but lacks additional context such as result format, ordering, or limitations. It is adequate for a simple list tool but not exceptional.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With zero parameters, schema coverage is trivially 100%. The description adds no parameter information, but none is needed. Baseline for 0 params is 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'List' and the resource 'all subscription items', distinguishing it from sibling tools like SubscripitonItems_Retrieveasubs (single retrieval) and SubscripitonItems_Updateasubscr (update).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of filters, pagination, or comparisons to other list tools. The agent is left to infer usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/savhascelik/meta-api-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server