DiscountRedemptions_Retrieveadi

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It only states 'retrieve,' implying a read operation, but does not disclose pagination behavior, filtering semantics, authentication needs, or rate limits. The behavioral profile is insufficiently communicated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it omits critical details. It earns a baseline score for lack of verbosity, but the brevity comes at the cost of completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of an output schema, the tool description must explain the return value. It does not. Combined with insufficient parameter explanations and no behavioral details, the description is incomplete for effective tool selection and invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although schema description coverage is 100%, the parameter descriptions merely repeat the parameter names (e.g., 'Query parameter: page[size]') without adding meaning. The tool description does not explain how or why to use any parameter, providing no semantic value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Retrieve a discount redemption' clearly identifies the resource and action, but it does not distinguish between retrieving a single redemption versus listing multiple. The presence of pagination parameters (page[size], page[number]) suggests a list operation, creating ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as DiscountRedemptions_Listalldisc or other retrieval tools. The description lacks any contextual cues for appropriate usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.