SubscripitonItems_Retrieveasubs
Retrieve current usage data for a subscription item.
Instructions
Retrieve a subscription items current usage
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve current usage data for a subscription item.
Retrieve a subscription items current usage
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It implies a read-only retrieval but does not explain what 'current usage' entails, how it is scoped (e.g., requires item ID from context), or any rate limits or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, front-loading the action and object. Minor grammatical issue ('a subscription items') slightly detracts but overall efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema, the description should explain the return value structure. The phrase 'current usage' is vague; does it return a number, a breakdown, or a report? Lacks completeness for a retrieval tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 0 parameters with 100% coverage, so no additional parameter explanation is needed. The description does not add superfluous parameter info, which is acceptable.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses the verb 'Retrieve' and specifies the resource 'subscription items current usage', making the purpose clear. It distinguishes from the sibling 'SubscripitonItems_Listallsubscr' which lists all items.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to retrieve usage vs list items. No context on prerequisites or expected usage scenario.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/savhascelik/meta-api-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server