Stores_Retrieveastore
Retrieve store data via the Meta API. Provides store information for use in workflows.
Instructions
Retrieve a store
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve store data via the Meta API. Provides store information for use in workflows.
Retrieve a store
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only states 'Retrieve a store' without disclosing authentication needs, error behavior, or side effects. For a read operation, basic safety characteristics are entirely missing.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise at one sentence, but insufficiently informative. Acceptable for a minimal description, but lacks front-loaded critical details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, no annotations, and a terse description leave the agent without essential context about return structure or success/failure indicators.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With zero parameters and 100% schema coverage, the schema fully documents the input. Baseline for 0 params is 4; description adds no extra meaning, but none is required.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description 'Retrieve a store' is essentially a tautology of the tool name, adding no new information. It does not specify the scope or return format, and fails to distinguish from sibling retrieve tools like 'Customers_Retrieveacustomer'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives such as 'Stores_Listallstores'. No context on prerequisites or typical scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/savhascelik/meta-api-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server