conduyt_get_dashboard

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It does reveal that the response includes the dashboard's tiles and their reports, which is useful return-shape context, but it omits permissions, error conditions, and other operational behavior expected for a get operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded phrase with no wasted words. However, its extreme brevity leaves it under-specified rather than optimally concise for an agent needing to invoke the tool correctly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema is present, so the description should provide more return-value context. It mentions tiles and reports but does not explain the dashboard object structure, error behavior, or required identifier semantics, making it incomplete for a retrieval tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not mention the sole required 'id' parameter at all. It does not compensate for the schema's lack of descriptive coverage by explaining that 'id' identifies a specific dashboard.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the resource ('One dashboard') and the returned components ('tiles and their reports'), which distinguishes it somewhat from list-oriented siblings. However, it lacks an explicit verb and does not directly name the retrieval action, leaving the purpose merely implied rather than clearly stated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_dashboards, run_dashboard, or get_dashboard-related operations. The single phrase 'One dashboard' only loosely implies retrieval of a specific dashboard and provides no exclusions or context conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.