Conduyt MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Conduyt MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage a fully customizable CRM, including contacts, companies, sales pipelines, custom objects and fields, file uploads, and data relationships via MCP over HTTP.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with a CRM covering companies, people, leads, deals, and more, with role checks, scoped agent keys, approval gates, and a shared audit trail.AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible AI clients to search and view CRM customers, deals, contracts, tasks, calendars, and outbound jobs, and to propose opt-in write actions that require human approval in the CRM.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceConnects any MCP-capable AI assistant—ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor and others—to an AI-native CRM via OAuth, so users can manage contacts, deals, pipelines, reports and add-ons by chat, with every action scoped to the connecting user's role. The server itself never calls an AI model or holds API keys, leaving all intelligence to the assistant you bring.1 npmAGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI agents with 220+ tools for building websites, sending email, managing contacts, invoicing, databases, automation, and more through a single secure connection. Features hardware-bound authentication and works with Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, and other MCP-compatible clients.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read and write CRM data—companies, contacts, opportunities, tasks, and interactions—through MCP, with OAuth and provenance tracking for every value.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 292 tools
The set has many overlapping clusters: AI insight tools (ai_insights, ai_summarize_contact, ai_daily_brief, ai_agenda, ai_next_actions, ai_feed, ai_chat), dashboard/report tools, sequence vs drip-campaign tools, and bulk edit vs bulk update variants. Detailed descriptions help, but with 292 tools an agent will often struggle to select the right one without first reading several similar candidates.
All names share the conduyt_ prefix and snake_case, which is helpful, but the verb_noun pattern is not consistent: many tools are noun phrases or configuration endpoints (conduyt_api_catalog, conduyt_mcp_coverage, conduyt_dashboard, conduyt_sms_transports, conduyt_voice_drop, conduyt_whatsapp_templates, conduyt_call_flow_roster). The conventions are readable but mixed enough to fall short of a predictable pattern.
292 tools is an extreme surface for a single MCP server and far beyond what an agent can reliably scan or choose from. Even though the CRM domain is broad, the count creates substantial cognitive and selection overhead, with many niche settings and reporting tools crowding out core actions.
Coverage is extensive across contacts, deals, tasks, pipelines, reporting, automations, calls, messaging, billing, settings, and integrations, with many lifecycle operations present. Some gaps remain, such as missing delete/update operations for a few core entities (appointments, activities, products, templates, invoices, sequences), but most workflows have workarounds.