list_turnstile_widgets

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description itself must convey behavior. 'List' signals a read-only enumeration, and the account scope is stated, but the description does not mention pagination, response shape, or any permissions/limitations. It is adequate but thin.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that is front-loaded with the action and resource, with a helpful parenthetical. No redundant words or content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter read-only list call with no output schema, the description covers what the tool does and its scope. It does not describe pagination or return value details, but the operation is simple enough that 'List ... widgets for an account' gives an agent sufficient information to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the single parameter account_id is described in the schema as 'The account ID'. The description's 'for an account' reinforces the parameter's meaning but adds no new detail beyond the schema, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (List), a specific resource (Turnstile widgets), a scope (for an account), and clarifies the domain with 'CAPTCHA alternatives'. The verb and resource make it easy to distinguish from get_turnstile_widget and other list_* tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'for an account' implies the tool is used to enumerate widgets belonging to a given account, but it does not explicitly state when to prefer this over get_turnstile_widget or mention any exclusions. Usage context is implied, not made explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.