get_account_token

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral transparency burden. It only says 'Get details'—essentially restating the read operation implied by the name—and provides no information about response contents, error behavior, permission requirements, or how the token is scoped to the account.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It delivers the core action and resource immediately and is appropriately sized for a simple getter.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a low-complexity tool with 100% schema coverage and two required parameters, the description is minimally sufficient to invoke the tool. However, with no output schema, no annotations, and no mention of what 'details' includes or how this differs from verify_account_token, it is not fully self-contained.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Both parameters have full schema description coverage, so the schema already explains token_id and account_id. The description adds no parameter-level meaning beyond identifying the resource as an API token, which matches the baseline of 3 for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear action (get) and resource (API token), and 'details' implies a single-token lookup, which separates it from list_account_tokens. It does not explicitly contrast itself with verify_account_token or other token-related siblings, so it is clear but not fully differentiated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention list_account_tokens for enumeration, verify_account_token for validation, or any prerequisite checks, leaving the agent to infer the appropriate context from sibling names.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.