get_cloudforce_one_events_aggregate

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It implies a read operation via 'Get' and suggests a summarized result via 'aggregate', but it does not explain pagination, time windows, filtering, account scope semantics, or what the returned aggregate actually represents.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no filler, but it is under-specified rather than appropriately sized. It front-loads the operation name but does not provide enough substance for a high score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no output schema and no annotations, so the description should clarify the return value and aggregate semantics. It does neither, leaving the agent with only a terse, ambiguous phrase. The single parameter is documented well, but the overall call context is incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the only parameter, account_id, is already described as 'The account ID'. The tool description adds no additional parameter meaning or context, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb and resource: 'Get Cloudforce One events aggregate'. It distinguishes itself at a basic level from siblings like get_cloudforce_one_event and list_cloudforce_one_events by referring to the 'aggregate' resource, but it does not explain what 'aggregate' means or what data it contains.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives such as list_cloudforce_one_events or get_cloudforce_one_event. The intended distinction is only implicit in the tool name, not explained in the description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.