get_seat_offerings_that_user_is_member

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false. The description adds value by specifying the HTTP method (GET) and endpoint path, and explicitly stating it returns a list of all seat offerings for the user. This provides additional behavioral context beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, with only a few lines. The first line is somewhat redundant with annotations but not misleading. The core information is front-loaded in the second sentence. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Without an output schema, the description states it returns a list of seat offerings. This is sufficient for a simple read operation with one input. More detail could be added about the structure of seat offering objects, but given the tool's simplicity and annotation coverage, it is reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage for the single parameter 'id', describing it as 'User Id or email (encoded string)'. The description does not add new meaning beyond mentioning 'specified user', so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves seat offerings that a user is a member of, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like 'get_seat_offerings' (which may list all offerings) and 'get_users_seat_offering' (which likely gets users for an offering) by focusing on a single user's memberships.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description only states its function, without clarifying prerequisites, when not to use it, or contrasting it with similar sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.