Skip to main content
Glama

get_customers_per_affiliate

Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve the paginated list of customers associated with an affiliate, sorted by most recent first.

Instructions

🟢 READ-ONLY · Affiliates · GET /v2/affiliates/{id}/customers

Get all customers per affiliate

Retrieves all the customers connected with the affiliate specified by the provided affiliate id. The customers are in sorted order, with the most recently created customer appearing first, and the list is paginated, with a limit of 20 customers per page.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesAffiliate Id or email (encoded string)
pageNoFilter by the page number. In case page number is higher than the maximum one, the results of last page will be returned
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint and idempotentHint. The description adds that results are sorted by most recent and paginated with 20 per page, providing behavioral context beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, front-loaded with a READ-ONLY tag and endpoint, and uses two clear sentences. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description explains pagination and sorting but does not specify the structure of returned customer objects. Since there is no output schema, providing typical fields would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and both parameters are well-described. The description adds that results are paginated with a limit of 20, but does not add further semantic meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves customers for a given affiliate, with ordering and pagination details. It distinguishes from similar tools like get_leads_per_affiliate by specifying 'customers'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving customers per affiliate but does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternatives such as get_leads_per_affiliate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ohneben/Learnworlds-MCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server