yougile_update_string_sticker_state

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, so the mutation is disclosed. The description adds a minor constraint (State IDs are 12-char hex strings) but does not elaborate on effects like soft-delete behavior or reversibility. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short, front-loaded sentences convey the core purpose and a key identifier format. The second sentence is slightly redundant with the schema but serves as a useful reminder. No filler or unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple mutation tool with full parameter schemas and destructive annotations, the description is adequate. It could mention that name, color, and deleted are updatable fields or describe response behavior, but the absence of output schema and the simplicity of the operation make this sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description's note about 12-char hex state IDs simply repeats what is already in the schema for `stateId`, adding no additional parameter semantics beyond the structured definitions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Update') and the specific resource ('a state of a string sticker'), distinguishing it from sibling tool `yougile_update_string_sticker` which targets the sticker itself. The additional detail about State IDs being 12-char hex strings clarifies the target identifier.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for updating a string sticker's state but gives no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like `yougile_update_string_sticker` or `yougile_update_sprint_sticker_state`. There is no mention of exclusions or specific scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.