yougile_create_project_role

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, and the description does not contradict them. However, the description adds no additional behavioral context beyond 'create', such as side effects, permissions, or return value, so the transparency is adequate but not enhanced.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no redundant words. It efficiently communicates the essential purpose without filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple 3-parameter create operation, the schema and annotations provide adequate invocation context. However, the description does not describe the return value (no output schema), nor does it clarify behavior when optional 'users' is omitted or whether role names must be unique per project. It is functional but not fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers all three parameters with descriptions ('Role name', 'User UUIDs to assign this role', 'Project UUID'), so description-level parameter explanation is not needed. The description itself adds no extra parameter semantics, matching the baseline for 100% schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and the resource ('a new role in a project'), which matches the tool name and distinguishes it from sibling tools like update_project_role or create_project. It is specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The imperative 'Create' implies this is the tool to use when adding a new project role, but there is no explicit guidance about when not to use it or how it compares to alternatives like update_project_role or delete_project_role. Usage context is only implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.