yougile_create_sprint_sticker_state

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already set readOnlyHint=false, indicating a write operation. The description adds that this is a create action for a sprint sticker state, which is consistent but does not disclose additional behavioral traits such as required permissions, effect on existing states, or return behavior. Thus, it provides minimal added context beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that directly states the tool's purpose without extraneous information. It is highly efficient and front-loaded, earning a perfect score for conciseness and structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple create operation with full schema coverage and annotations, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks context about what the 'state' represents, what a successful creation returns (no output schema exists), and any special behavior. More detail would improve completeness, but the tool's simplicity keeps it at a neutral score.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage for all three parameters, so the schema already explains each parameter. The description itself does not add parameter-level detail, but since the schema is complete, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Create' and the resource 'a state (option) for a sprint sticker', which distinguishes it from sibling tools like yougile_create_string_sticker_state. It specifies both the operation and the object, leaving no ambiguity about what the tool does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention any prerequisites, nor does it contrast with sibling tools such as yougile_update_sprint_sticker_state. The reader must infer usage purely from the tool name and description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.