yougile_create_webhook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false and openWorldHint=true, so the agent knows it is a mutating operation with external side effects. The description adds no further behavioral details such as whether the URL is validated, if a test event is sent, or any rate limits. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise, front-loaded sentence with no filler words. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description and schema cover the core action and parameters, but with no output schema, it lacks information about return values (e.g., created webhook object). It also does not clarify which event types are supported. Given the tool's simplicity, this is adequate but leaves clear gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all parameters have descriptions in the schema itself. The tool description does not add extra meaning to parameters; it only restates the general purpose. The event parameter's description 'Event type to listen for' remains vague without an enumeration or examples, but the schema already provides that baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create a webhook to receive events at a URL' clearly states the tool's purpose with a specific verb (create), resource (webhook), and function (receive events at a URL). It distinguishes this from sibling tools like yougile_list_webhooks and yougile_update_webhook.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention that yougile_update_webhook should be used for modifying existing webhooks, nor does it describe preconditions or context where creation is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.