yougile_create_sprint_sticker

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate a mutating, non-destructive operation (readOnlyHint false, destructiveHint false). The description adds no extra behavioral context such as permissions, side effects, or failure conditions. The 'Use name field' note is parameter-focused rather than behavior-focused.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences, front-loaded with the primary action. It contains zero redundant content and is highly efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple 2-parameter create tool with annotations and schema, the description is minimally sufficient. However, it lacks context about what a sprint sticker is, its relationship to projects, or what the response contains. This leaves some gaps for a full understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters. The description adds value by clarifying to use 'name' rather than 'title', which preempts a common mistake given other tools may use 'title'. This goes beyond the schema's minimal 'Sticker name' description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a sprint sticker' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like yougile_create_string_sticker by specifying the 'sprint' variant. However, it does not elaborate on what a sprint sticker is or how it differs from related concepts.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool compared to alternatives. The only usage-related note is 'Use name field (not title)', which is parameter-level instruction rather than context for tool selection. No mention of alternative tools or scenarios is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.