reorder_rename_presets

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states the move operation but does not disclose side effects, whether indexes are zero-based, what happens on invalid indices, or whether the operation is reversible. For a mutating reorder operation, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that front-loads the verb and resource, using only necessary words. It is appropriately sized for a simple operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter tool, the description gives the core action and parameter roles, but lacks context on index semantics and return value. Given no output schema and no annotations, it is minimally viable but has clear gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description must compensate. It clarifies that oldIndex and newIndex are source and target positions, but it does not explain the indexing convention (zero-based vs one-based), bounds, or behavior when moving within the same list. This leaves critical meaning undefined.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (reorder), the resource (rename presets), and the mechanism (moving from oldIndex to newIndex). This distinguishes it from sibling CRUD tools like update_rename_preset or delete_rename_preset.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The purpose implies when to use it, but there is no explicit guidance on when to use this versus alternatives, nor any mention of prerequisites or exclusions. The description doesn't state 'use this to change ordering' which is implicit from the verb.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.