delete_access_grant

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description merely paraphrases the tool name. It fails to disclose any behavioral traits such as irreversibility, permissions, side effects, or relationship to related tools like revoke_access_request.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one short, clear sentence. It is front-loaded and concise, though it adds little beyond the name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a delete (mutation) tool with no annotations or output schema, the description is too thin. It doesn't clarify what the 'id' refers to (access grant ID vs resource ID), the consequences of deletion, or how this differs from related revocation tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already documents the single parameter 'id' with description. Tool description adds no extra parameter meaning, but schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Delete' and resource 'access grant', clearly distinguishing this tool from other delete/revoke operations in the sibling list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool, no alternatives, no exclusions. The description only restates the action without contextual advice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.