d365fo_clone_profile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description fails to disclose behavioral traits such as whether cloning overwrites existing profiles, permissions required, or error handling. The return type is vaguely described as a dictionary.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and well-structured, with the main action in the first line. The Args/Returns section is redundant but not overly long. A minor improvement would be removing redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's moderate complexity (cloning with optional modifications) and the lack of behavioral details in the description, it is incomplete. The output schema exists but is not leveraged, and key aspects like conflict resolution are omitted.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema coverage, the description adds basic meaning for each parameter (e.g., 'Name of the profile to clone'). However, it does not provide additional details like constraints or effects beyond what the schema titles imply.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Clone an existing D365FO environment profile with optional modifications,' using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like create_profile and update_profile, which perform different operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide any guidance on when to clone vs. create or update a profile. No alternative tools are mentioned, nor are conditions for using this tool specified.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.