Skip to main content
Glama
lmwilki

civ6-mcp

by lmwilki
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

get_spies

Read-only

Retrieve a list of all your spy units including their current location, rank, and available missions. Use this to plan your next spy actions.

Instructions

List all your spy units with position, rank, city, and available missions.

Shows each spy's composite id (needed for spy_action), current location,
rank (Recruit/Agent/Special Agent/Senior Agent), XP, and which operations
are available at their current position.

Note: offensive missions only become available once the spy has physically
arrived in the target city. Use spy_action with action='travel' first.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.1.11

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds context beyond readOnlyHint annotation: describes output fields and the condition for offensive missions being available. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short paragraphs with front-loaded purpose and clear structure. Every sentence adds value with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Fully explains what the tool returns and includes a key usage note. Given zero parameters and existence of output schema, description is complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. Baseline of 4 applies; description does not need to add parameter info.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it lists spy units with specific attributes (position, rank, city, missions). It distinguishes from sibling tool spy_action by mentioning the composite id is needed for actions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs spy_action, including a prerequisite note that offensive missions require prior travel via spy_action.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools