Veeam VBR v13 MCP Server

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only states 'Remove' without clarifying if this is permanent, reversible, requires specific permissions, or has side effects (e.g., data loss, dependency breaks). It misses critical behavioral details for a destructive operation, though it correctly implies mutation without contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no wasted words. It is appropriately sized for a simple tool and front-loads the core action, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive tool with no annotations, no output schema, and minimal parameter guidance, the description is inadequate. It fails to address critical context like confirmation prompts, error conditions, or what happens post-removal, leaving significant gaps for safe agent operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage for the single 'id' parameter, and the description adds no parameter details. However, with only one parameter and a straightforward tool name, the baseline is 3 as the agent can infer 'id' refers to the data source identifier, though explicit guidance would improve clarity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Remove') and target resource ('unstructured data source'), making the purpose understandable. However, it doesn't specify what constitutes an 'unstructured data source' or differentiate from similar deletion tools like DeleteRepository or DeleteManagedServer, preventing a perfect score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description lacks context about prerequisites (e.g., whether the data source must be idle or backed up), exclusions, or relationships to sibling tools like CreateUnstructuredDataServer or GetAllUnstructuredDataServers.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.