Veeam VBR v13 MCP Server

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states 'Uninstall' implies a destructive mutation, but doesn't mention permissions required, whether it's reversible, what happens to associated data, or any side effects like service disruption. This is inadequate for a tool that likely modifies system state.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, direct sentence with no wasted words, making it easy to parse. It front-loads the core action and target, though it lacks detail due to brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no annotations, 0% schema coverage, no output schema, and two parameters (including a nested object), the description is insufficient. It doesn't cover parameter meanings, behavioral implications, or expected outcomes, leaving critical gaps for safe and correct usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the schema provides no parameter documentation. The description mentions 'discovered entities' but doesn't explain the 'id' and 'body' parameters—what they represent, how to format them, or examples. It adds minimal value beyond the tool name, failing to compensate for the schema gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Uninstall') and target resource ('Veeam Agent from discovered entities'), making the purpose immediately understandable. It doesn't differentiate from siblings like 'InstallAgentOnDiscoveredEntities' or 'UpgradeAgentOnDiscoveredEntities', but the verb 'Uninstall' is specific enough to distinguish it as a removal operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or exclusions. Given siblings like 'InstallAgentOnDiscoveredEntities' and 'UpgradeAgentOnDiscoveredEntities', it fails to specify scenarios where uninstallation is appropriate over other actions, leaving usage context ambiguous.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.