DeleteDatastoreLatencySettings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It implies a destructive operation ('Remove'), but fails to specify critical details such as required permissions, whether the removal is reversible, potential side effects, or what happens to the datastore after removal. This is a significant gap for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no unnecessary words, making it highly efficient and front-loaded. It directly communicates the core action without any fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's destructive nature, lack of annotations, no output schema, and minimal parameter guidance, the description is insufficient. It does not address behavioral risks, output expectations, or usage context, leaving critical gaps for safe and effective tool invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description mentions 'for a specific datastore', which hints at the 'id' parameter's purpose, but schema description coverage is 0% and the description does not clarify the format or constraints of the 'id'. Since there is only one parameter, the baseline is higher, but the description adds minimal value beyond what is obvious from the tool name and context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Remove') and the target resource ('latency settings for a specific datastore'), making the purpose immediately understandable. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from potential siblings like 'UpdateDatastoreLatencySettings' or 'GetDatastoreLatencySettings', which would be needed for a perfect score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or exclusions. It simply states what the tool does without contextual usage information, leaving the agent to infer appropriate scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.