update_accessory

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as idempotency, side effects, required permissions, or error handling (e.g., what happens if the accessory ID does not exist). The description adds zero behavioral context beyond the word 'update'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (one sentence), which is concise but at the expense of completeness. Important details about parameters, usage, and behavior are omitted, making it under-specified rather than effectively concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (9 parameters, no annotations, no output schema) and the many sibling tools, the description is entirely inadequate. It does not explain return values, side effects, or how updates behave. The description is not complete enough for an AI agent to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 11%, leaving 8 of 9 parameters undocumented. The description does not explain or provide meaning for any parameter (e.g., accessory_brand, accessory_region). It fails to add value beyond the sparse schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Update accessory yang sudah ada' which identifies the verb (update) and resource (accessory). However, it does not specify what fields or aspects of the accessory can be updated, nor does it distinguish this tool from similar sibling tools like update_componen_product. It is minimally clear but lacks specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., create_accessory, get_accessory, delete_accessory). There is no mention of prerequisites, when not to use it, or relationships to other tools. The description offers no usage direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.