delete_componen_product
Delete a component product by its ID. Performs a soft delete to remove it from the system.
Instructions
Hapus (soft delete) satu componen product berdasarkan ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Delete a component product by its ID. Performs a soft delete to remove it from the system.
Hapus (soft delete) satu componen product berdasarkan ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description explicitly mentions 'soft delete', which is a behavioral trait beyond what annotations provide (none). However, it does not explain consequences like reversibility or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no extraneous words, efficiently conveying the core purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple one-parameter delete tool, the description covers the basic operation and notes soft deletion. However, it lacks details about post-deletion state or error handling, leaving some gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description mentions 'ID' as the key parameter, but provides no additional meaning beyond what the input schema already specifies (type: string, format: uuid). Schema coverage is 0% and the description fails to compensate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Hapus (soft delete)' and the resource 'componen product' using the identifier 'ID'. It distinguishes this tool from sibling delete tools by specifying the exact resource type.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to use other delete tools or any prerequisites for deletion.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/itmsi/mcp-quotation-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server