get_accessories_by_island

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states that it gets data, but does not mention side effects, permissions, rate limits, pagination, or any other behavioral traits. The description is insufficient for a read operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is front-loaded with the action and resource. Every word is necessary to convey the purpose, and there is no extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lacks information about the return format or structure, as there is no output schema. It only states 'all accessories available', which may be sufficient but does not clarify if there is pagination or how the results are presented. Given the tool's simplicity, the description is minimally adequate but incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with the 'idisland' parameter described as 'Island UUID'. The description adds the context of filtering by island/region, but this is already implied by the parameter name and schema description. The description adds minimal value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves all accessories for a specific island/region, using the verb 'ambil' (get) and specifying the resource 'accessory' and filter by island_id. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'get_accessory' (singular) and 'list_accessories' (unfiltered).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when you need accessories for a specific island, but does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternatives. The context is clear, but no exclusions or comparative guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.