create_term_content

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, and the description only states the action (create) without disclosing behavioral traits such as idempotency, side effects, permissions required, or whether duplicates are allowed. The description carries the full burden but provides essentially no behavioral info.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence, very concise with no wasted words. However, it is somewhat under-specified given the tool's complexity, but it does not contain redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has a nested object parameter and no output schema, yet the description does not explain return values, error handling, or the exact expected structure of the nested object beyond the schema. It is incomplete for the complexity level.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 67% (2 of 3 parameters have descriptions). The description does not add any additional meaning beyond what is in the schema. According to the baseline rule, a score of 3 is appropriate since coverage is moderate and the description adds no extra value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Buat term content (syarat & ketentuan) baru' clearly states the action (create) and resource (term content), with an explanatory translation. It distinguishes from sibling create tools for other entities (e.g., create_accessory, create_quotation). However, it could be more explicit about the structure of term content.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. While sibling tools are for different entities, there is no mention of prerequisites, alternatives, or when not to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.