get_sales_employee

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. The description only states the action without mentioning any behavioral traits such as required permissions, rate limits, response format, or side effects. For a read operation, this is minimal but acceptable; however, more transparency would be beneficial.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that conveys everything needed concisely. No unnecessary words. The structure is efficient and front-loaded with the action and resource.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema, no nested objects), the description is adequate but not complete. It does not specify what details are returned, which could be important for an agent. Without an output schema, the description should provide a hint about the response content.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage for the single parameter (id), which already specifies it is a UUID. The description redundantly repeats 'berdasarkan ID (UUID)', adding no new semantic information beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the tool retrieves details of a single sales employee by ID (UUID). It uses a specific verb ('Ambil' = Get) and resource ('detail satu sales employee'), and clearly distinguishes from the sibling 'list_sales_employees' which returns multiple records.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use or not is provided. However, the tool's purpose (get single by ID) and the presence of sibling 'list_sales_employees' imply that this tool is for retrieving a specific employee when the ID is known. The lack of explicit instructions or alternatives reduces clarity.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.