Skip to main content
Glama

warehouses_edit

Modify configuration settings of an existing SQL warehouse, including cluster size, auto-stop, and type, using its ID.

Instructions

Edit an existing SQL warehouse's configuration. Returns the warehouse id.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesSQL warehouse ID
nameNo
cluster_sizeNo
max_num_clustersNo
min_num_clustersNo
auto_stop_minsNo
enable_photonNo
enable_serverless_computeNo
warehouse_typeNoPRO | CLASSIC
tagsNo
channelNo
spot_instance_policyNoCOST_OPTIMIZED | RELIABILITY_OPTIMIZED | POLICY_UNSPECIFIED
instance_profile_arnNo
jdbc_url_optionsNo
google_service_accountNo
custom_tagsNo
lakehouse_uc_configNo
query_history_monitoringNo
query_history_tableNo
pipeline_configurationNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate write operation (readOnlyHint=false). Description adds return of warehouse id but does not disclose idempotency, partial update support, or required permissions. Minimal added value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences: one for purpose, one for return. No redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 20 mostly undocumented parameters, the description lacks essential details about configuration options, constraints, and behavior. Output schema existence is indicated but details are absent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only 15% of parameters have schema descriptions. The description adds no explanations for the 20 parameters; the agent must infer from names and types alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description uses specific verb 'Edit' and resource 'SQL warehouse configuration', clearly distinguishing from sibling tools like warehouses_create, warehouses_get, etc.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like warehouses_create or warehouses_update; no prerequisites (e.g., warehouse must exist) or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/inav/databricks-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server