sharing_providers_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotation readOnlyHint=false already indicates this tool modifies state. The description adds no behavioral details beyond the bare action, such as required permissions, side effects, or rate limits. For a write operation, more context about impact is expected.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise—a single sentence with the core purpose and API route. Every word earns its place; no fluff. However, it could be considered too brief, but for a simple create operation, it is appropriately sized and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (5 parameters, 1 required) and presence of an output schema, the description is minimally complete. It lacks mention of return values, error conditions, or idempotency, but the output schema partially compensates. It adequately covers the creation action.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already covers 4 of 5 parameters with descriptions (80% coverage). The description adds no additional parameter-level information beyond what the schema provides. The baseline of 3 is appropriate since the schema does most of the work.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Create) and the resource (Delta Sharing provider). It also includes the API endpoint, which clarifies the specific scope. However, it does not elaborate on what a Delta Sharing provider is or differentiate it from related sharing operations, though the sibling tools provide context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like sharing_providers_get or sharing_recipients_create. No prerequisites, use cases, or exclusions are mentioned, leaving the agent to infer context from sibling names alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.