lakeview_dashboard_publish

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The readOnlyHint=false annotation indicates mutation, and the description confirms a write operation. However, it does not disclose side effects (e.g., visibility changes, snapshot creation) or explain the embed_credentials parameter's behavioral implications.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence. While efficient, it could include more contextual information without sacrificing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the existence of many sibling dashboard tools and an output schema, the description is too minimal. It does not clarify what happens after publishing, how to revert, or how embed_credentials affects the operation, leaving the agent underinformed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 50% (dashboard_id has a description, embed_credentials has none). The description adds no additional meaning: it does not explain the purpose of embed_credentials or provide usage context beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Publish' and clearly identifies the resource as a 'Lakeview dashboard', distinguishing it from sibling tools like create, update, unpublish, etc. It also clarifies the scope to the latest draft.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as lakeview_dashboard_unpublish, or on prerequisites like having a draft. The description omits usage context entirely.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.