genie_create_space

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnlyHint: false, so the description's 'Create' is consistent. However, beyond that, the description adds no behavioral context such as required permissions, side effects, rate limits, or what happens on creation. It does not contradict annotations but adds no extra value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (6 words), which is efficient and front-loaded. However, it may be too brief given the tool's complexity (5 parameters, a creation operation), but it meets the minimum requirement without extraneous text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that the tool has an output schema (not shown) and moderate schema coverage, the description is functionally complete in stating the action, but lacks depth. It does not explain what a Genie space is, what inputs are necessary, or any constraints, making it adequate but not comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 60%, with some parameters described in the schema (title, data_source_id, serialized_space). The description does not elaborate on any parameters or provide additional meaning beyond the schema, failing to compensate for the moderate coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create a Genie AI/BI space' clearly specifies the action (create) and the resource (Genie AI/BI space), distinguishing it from sibling tools like genie_delete_space, genie_get_space, genie_list_spaces, and genie_update_space.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No prerequisites, context, or exclusions are mentioned, leaving the agent without direction on appropriate usage scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.