account_workspaces_delete

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds no behavioral context beyond what annotations already provide ('destructiveHint': true). It does not mention irreversibility, permission requirements, or side effects. Annotations cover the destructive trait, but the description should enrich transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise—a single sentence. For a simple tool with one parameter, this is efficient. However, it could be slightly more structured (e.g., including the parameter action) without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, output schema present, annotations), the description is minimal but adequate. It covers the basic operation, but lacks details like requirement for existing workspace or typical return. Annotations and schema fill some gaps, so it meets minimum viability.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The parameter 'workspace_id' is fully described in the schema as 'Workspace ID' (100% coverage). The description does not add any additional meaning or constraints. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate since schema already documents the parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Delete') and the resource ('a workspace'). It is specific and distinguishes from sibling tools like account_workspaces_create, account_workspaces_get, etc., which are the only other workspace operations. No ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites (e.g., workspace must exist) or when deletion is appropriate. Simply states the action without context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.