Skip to main content
Glama

provider_delete_1_0_0_sessions_by_id

DestructiveIdempotent

Logs out the current user by deleting the specified session ID, ending their authenticated VCF Automation session.

Instructions

Logs out the current user DELETE /cloudapi/1.0.0/sessions/{id}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes(path)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.2.0

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, idempotentHint=true, readOnlyHint=false, and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds that the behavioral outcome is a logout, but it does not explain session invalidation, ownership constraints, or whether an arbitrary session id can be targeted.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The definition is short and front-loads the effect before the endpoint. The endpoint partly duplicates the title/name, but the description is compact and not padded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter delete-session tool with rich destructive/idempotent annotations and no output schema, the description covers the core purpose and endpoint adequately. The remaining gaps are sibling differentiation and precise id semantics, but they are not severe for this simple operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and there is only one parameter, id, already typed as a path string. The description mentions {id} through the endpoint but does not clarify what the id represents or whether it must be the current session, so it adds little beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action and resource: logging out a user by deleting a session at DELETE /cloudapi/1.0.0/sessions/{id}. It is clear enough to identify the operation, but it does not differentiate from the sibling provider_logout_current_session and says 'current user' despite taking an explicit id parameter.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no when-to-use guidance, prerequisites, or alternative routing. With a closely related sibling such as provider_logout_current_session, an agent receives no help choosing between them.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools