Skip to main content
Glama

iaas_delete_internal_network_ip_range

DestructiveIdempotent

Deletes an internal network IP range by its ID, removing the specified range from the infrastructure.

Instructions

Delete internal network IP range Delete internal network IP range with a given id DELETE /iaas/api/network-ip-ranges/{id}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesThe ID of the network IP range. (path)
apiVersionNoThe version of the API in yyyy-MM-dd format (UTC). For versioning information refer to /iaas/api/about

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.2.0

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, idempotentHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, so the safety profile is covered elsewhere. The description adds only the raw HTTP path and restates the operation; it says nothing about what happens to dependent resources, whether deletion can be undone, or what permissions are needed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is short and front-loaded, but the first two lines say the same thing ("Delete internal network IP range" repeated with "with a given id"), so one of them does not earn its place. The endpoint line is the only additional content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive delete tool the structured data does most of the work: annotations flag it as destructive and idempotent, and the schema fully documents both parameters. The description is minimally sufficient but leaves the agent without any note on side effects or prerequisites before performing an irreversible operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both the id and apiVersion parameters are already documented in the schema. The description's "with a given id" is redundant with that schema text and adds no format or validation detail, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ("Delete internal network IP range") and ties it to the concrete endpoint DELETE /iaas/api/network-ip-ranges/{id}, so an agent can distinguish it from the get/update siblings by the verb alone. It stops short of explicitly naming those siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as iaas_update_internal_network_ip_range or iaas_get_internal_network_ip_range, nor any preconditions such as checking that the range is unused before deletion.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools