Skip to main content
Glama

iaas_release_network_ips_by_user

Releases specified IPv4/IPv6 addresses from a user-managed network IP range through the VCF Automation IaaS API.

Instructions

release network IPs by user. release network IPs by user POST /iaas/api/network-ip-ranges/{id}/ip-addresses/release

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesThe ID of the network IP range. (path)
bodyYesSpecification for releasing ip addresses managed by the user — Release IP Address Specification
apiVersionNoThe version of the API in yyyy-MM-dd format (UTC). For versioning information refer to /iaas/api/about

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.2.0

TDQS

C2.7/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Since the annotations explicitly define this as a write operation (readOnlyHint: false), the description should provide context beyond just the action verb. It fails to disclose crucial behavioral details associated with state mutation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is redundant, repeating 'release network IPs by user' twice, once with a comma and once immediately following it, before appending the raw API path. This repetitive structure wastes word count.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

As a mutation tool that modifies network state, the description is critically underspecified. It provides the action but offers no useful context regarding prerequisites or potential side effects for a responsible AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, so the description does not need to add semantic meaning. It merely reiterates the resource (IPs) and the container (id/body), matching the baseline score for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the intent: 'release network IPs by user.' It is specific about the resource action, distinguishing it from other allocation or retrieval tools in the sibling list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide guidance on *when* to use this tool. It offers no context regarding the state of the IP range or whether the user should be using this over a similar API such as iaas_allocate_network_ips_by_user.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools