abx_delete_multiple_actions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, idempotentHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered without the description. The description adds nothing beyond that: no permissions needed, no statement on whether deletes are atomic, and no mention of what happens when an id does not exist.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the operation, which is good, but the first two lines restate the same fact ('Delete multiple actions by their id and projectId' / 'Deletes actions with a specific ID and projectId') without adding information. Three lines for one sentence of content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive bulk-mutation tool with no output schema, the description says nothing about response, partial-success behavior, permission requirements, or limits on batch size. The safety annotations cover only part of what an agent needs before calling it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline would be 3, but the description actively misleads: it says actions are deleted 'by their id and projectId' while the schema requires id and orgId and treats projectId as optional. An agent could omit a required field or assume an optional one is mandatory.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource (delete multiple actions) and the endpoint path, so the operation is identifiable. However it does not distinguish itself from the sibling abx_delete_action (single delete), leaving the 'multiple' scope to be inferred only by the name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use bulk delete versus the sibling abx_delete_action, no prerequisites, and no note about partial failures. The agent must infer selection purely from tool names.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.