Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to vcf-automation-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM clients to browse and manage VCF Automation projects, catalog items, and deployments through MCP tools, including provisioning, day-2 actions, and deleting infrastructure.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to interact with generated REST API services by exposing MCP tools and resources for CRUD operations, listing, and retrieval. It lets AI clients discover and call create, update, delete, list, and get-by-id actions against the same data available over REST.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to discover and invoke backend tools over MCP JSON-RPC while enforcing 3-legged OAuth 2.0 identity propagation, role-based access control, and protocol transcoding to REST APIs.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and MCP-enabled clients to discover and call application capabilities exposed as structured, schema-defined tools, with input validation, error handling, and API/database integration. It also ships a sample client that demonstrates secure tool execution and seamless AI-agent interoperability.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access a unified catalog of tools from various APIs (OpenAPI, GraphQL, MCP, Google Discovery) through the MCP protocol.
      2 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.4/5.0

    Scored across 698 tools

    Disambiguation1/5

    The 698-tool surface contains many overlapping or duplicate-looking operations across services: for example iaas_get_deployments vs deployment_get_deployments, iaas_get_projects vs project_get_all_projects, multiple cloud-account CRUD variants, and deprecated identity endpoints duplicating provider/cloudapi tools. An agent will struggle to choose the correct endpoint without deep knowledge of VCF service boundaries.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Names are mostly snake_case and service-prefixed, but the verb conventions are highly inconsistent: get vs retrieve vs query vs list vs fetch, create vs post, update vs modify vs patch, and path-derived names such as provider_delete_1_0_0_sessions_by_id and provider_post_1_0_0_sessions. The mix of deprecated names, odd abbreviations, and generated endpoint labels makes selection unpredictable.

    Tool Count1/5

    A 698-tool server is far beyond a reasonable tool surface for an agent-facing MCP server, even for a broad platform. The count includes many deprecated, admin, and duplicate endpoints that should be filtered or consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is extremely broad across IaaS, catalog, deployments, blueprints, ABX, approvals, identity/provider, projects, policy, onboarding, vRO, event broker, forms, and content. There are likely minor gaps and lifecycle inconsistencies, but the surface appears to cover most VCF Automation workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues