iaas_update_network_profile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, openWorldHint=true, idempotentHint=false, and destructiveHint=false. The description adds only the HTTP PATCH method, which hints at partial update semantics, but it does not explain what can be changed, whether omitted fields are cleared, or any auth/scope requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loads the action, but it is essentially a name-plus-endpoint stub. It is not bloated, but it also lacks substantive structure beyond restating the operation and HTTP path.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with a nested body, many optional fields, and no output schema, the description does not explain PATCH partial-update behavior, required fields like name and regionId, or what happens to unspecified fields. The rich schema helps, but the description remains insufficient for this complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema documents all parameters and the nested body fields thoroughly. The description adds no parameter meaning beyond the endpoint, but baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema carries the parameter documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description only restates the tool name ('Update network profile') and its HTTP title ('PATCH /iaas/api/network-profiles/{id}'). It gives the verb and resource but adds no distinguishing detail versus siblings such as iaas_create_network_profile, iaas_delete_network_profile, or iaas_get_network_profile.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus create, get, or delete network profile operations. No prerequisites, alternatives, or exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.