Skip to main content
Glama

Search Items

keychain_search_items
Read-only

Search vault items by text and filters including type, organization, folder, collection, URL, and trash status. Use this tool to find and retrieve credentials, notes, or other stored secrets.

Instructions

Search vault items by text and filters (org/folder/collection/url). This wraps bw list items --search, which does not reliably search custom field values.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
textNoOptional text filter for item names, usernames, URIs, and other indexed fields. Custom field values are not reliably searched.
typeNoOptional item type filter: login, note, ssh_key, card, or identity.
organizationIdNoBitwarden organization id filter for org-scoped item search.
folderIdNoPersonal folder id, not an organization collection id.
collectionIdNoBitwarden collection id, not a folder id.
urlNoOptional URL filter for item lookup.
trashNoSearch items in trash when true.
limitNoMaximum returned rows (1-500).
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description provides valuable behavioral context beyond the readOnlyHint annotation, including the underlying CLI command and the unreliability of custom field searches.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two concise sentences, front-loaded with the core functionality, and every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a search tool with 8 optional parameters, the description covers the main purpose and a key limitation. It could mention pagination or result format, but schema covers parameters well.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description does not need to add parameter details. The schema already describes all parameters adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it searches vault items by text and filters, and distinguishes itself from siblings by mentioning the underlying CLI command and a specific limitation about custom field values.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly mentions the limitation regarding custom field search, guiding when not to rely on it. However, it does not directly contrast with alternatives like keychain_get_item.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/icoretech/warden-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server