Edit Org Collection

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description confirms it is a mutation (readOnlyHint=false) and non-destructive (destructiveHint=false), and adds specific context: it renames and returns the updated collection summary. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single 16-word sentence that is front-loaded and contains no unnecessary words. It is highly efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description explains the effect, scope, and return value. Given the tool's simplicity and the presence of annotations, it covers the essential information. Could be improved by noting it only updates the name and no other properties.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Parameter schema coverage is 100% with adequate descriptions. The tool description does not add extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'rename', the resource 'organization-scoped collection', and the scope 'inside the required organizationId'. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like keychain_create_org_collection and keychain_delete_org_collection.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use this tool (to rename a collection) and notes it mutates metadata only, providing context. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or list alternatives, though sibling names make it clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.