todoist_user_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It states 'Get information' implying a read-only operation, but does not explicitly confirm no side effects, no authentication requirements, or response format details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence, front-loaded with the verb 'Get'. It conveys purpose efficiently with no wasted words, though it could benefit from a brief note about zero parameters.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (no parameters, no output schema), the description provides a reasonable overview of returned fields but is not exhaustive (e.g., does it return avatar URL? notification settings?). It omits output structure, which would be helpful for agent parsing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has zero parameters and 100% coverage. The description adds value by specifying which user attributes are returned (name, email, timezone, karma, account settings), compensating for the lack of an output schema and clarifying the tool's output.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves user information with specific fields (name, email, timezone, karma, account settings). It does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'todoist_user_settings_get' which may overlap, but the focus on 'current user' and listed fields provides reasonable distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., user_settings_get). No context about prerequisites or ideal scenarios. The description lacks any 'when to use' or 'when not to use' instructions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.