todoist_project_delete

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses a critical side effect: deletion of all tasks and sub-projects. Since no annotations are provided, this transparency is essential and well-covered.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences cover purpose and key behavioral note without redundancy or fluff. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose and cascade effect, but lacks details on return value (since no output schema), error conditions (e.g., non-existent project), or idempotency. More context would help an agent handle edge cases.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already fully describes both parameters with clear precedence and matching behavior. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Delete a project') and the affected resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like archive, update, or move by specifying 'delete' and noting cascade to tasks and sub-projects.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for deletion but lacks explicit guidance on when to prefer this over alternatives (e.g., archive) or prerequisites (e.g., ensure project is not needed). No mention of irreversibility or confirmation steps.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.