todoist_shared_label_remove

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description notes that tasks are not deleted and requires a Business account, providing behavioral context beyond the schema. It does not mention reversible operations or error handling but is adequate for the tool's simplicity.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences cover purpose, behavioral nuance, and requirement with no wasted words. The critical information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description covers purpose, behavior, and constraints. It could mention error cases but is otherwise sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The sole parameter 'name' is fully documented in the input schema with a description. The tool description does not add additional meaning or constraints beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it removes a shared label from all items, distinguishing it from sibling tools like todoist_shared_label_rename and todoist_shared_labels_get. The verb 'remove' and resource 'shared label' are specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It specifies the requirement for a Todoist Business account, which is a key usage condition. However, it does not explicitly contrast with alternatives like rename or get, though the unique name and context imply the correct use case.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.